ArticleCureus2026
Clinicopathological Profile and Real-World Survival Outcomes in Pure Uterine Sarcomas.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pure uterine sarcomas are rare and biologically aggressive malignancies with diverse histologic subtypes and heterogeneous clinical behavior. Owing to their low incidence, prospective data guiding optimal management and prognostic stratification remain limited, particularly in real-world settings. Evaluating survival outcomes and recurrence patterns in institutional cohorts is essential to better understand prognostic factors, treatment associations, and disease behavior. This study aimed to analyze survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, and clinicopathological factors influencing prognosis in patients with uterine sarcoma treated at a tertiary care center. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 patients with histologically confirmed pure uterine sarcoma as treated during the 10-year period of 2011-2020. Carcinosarcoma was not included in this study. Clinical details, histologic subtype, stage, surgical and adjuvant treatments, recurrence, and survival outcomes were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with prognosis. Results The mean age at diagnosis was 48 years, and most patients were multiparous and postmenopausal. The most common histologic type was leiomyosarcoma (48.1%), followed by low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (29.6%). Stage I was the most frequent (55.6%). About 32.1% received chemotherapy, 9.9% radiotherapy, and 7.4% hormonal therapy; half received no adjuvant treatment. Recurrence was observed in 44.4% of cases, most commonly involving the pelvis and lymph nodes, with the lungs and liver also affected. Median OS and DFS were 72 and 70 months, respectively. Patients with low-grade ESS and early-stage disease had better survival. Chemotherapy was associated with higher recurrence. Histologic subtype, stage, and adjuvant treatment significantly influenced outcomes. Conclusion Histologic subtype, disease stage, and type of adjuvant therapy were independently associated with survival and recurrence outcomes in our cohort of uterine sarcoma patients. Early-stage disease and low-grade tumors demonstrated more favorable survival patterns. Given the rarity and heterogeneity of uterine sarcomas, real-world survival analyses such as this study help refine prognostic stratification and inform individualized treatment strategies. These findings provide clinically relevant insights that may guide risk-adapted management in this challenging group of malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.