ReviewCureus2026
Adenocarcinoma Arising in Adenomyosis: A Narrative Review of Disease Concept, Molecular Pathogenesis, and Clinical Challenges.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenomyosis has long been regarded as a benign, estrogen-dependent uterine disorder. Accumulating pathological and molecular evidence now supports its role as a potential precursor lesion for endometrial carcinoma. Adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis (AAIA), in particular, represents a rare but clinically significant entity characterized by malignant transformation within adenomyotic lesions of the myometrium. Adenomyotic lesions exhibit local estrogen excess, progesterone resistance, and a chronically inflamed microenvironment. Molecular studies indicate that adenomyosis may constitute a clonal disease harboring somatic driver mutations shared with endometrioid carcinoma, including KRAS mutations and alterations in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. These observations support a multistep carcinogenesis model in which endometrial glands within adenomyosis accumulate genetic and epigenetic alterations, progress through atypical hyperplasia-like changes, and ultimately develop into invasive carcinoma. Adenomyosis-associated endometrial carcinoma encompasses two distinct pathological conditions: true carcinoma arising within adenomyosis (AAIA) and conventional endometrial carcinoma coexisting with adenomyosis. Accurate differentiation between these entities is essential, as AAIA often lacks an identifiable primary endometrial lesion and may therefore escape detection by conventional endometrial cytology or biopsy. In such cases, MRI, complemented by molecular pathological evaluation, plays a central diagnostic role. Management of AAIA generally follows established treatment strategies for endometrial carcinoma. However, advances in molecular classification, particularly those derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas, emphasize the importance of molecular subtype-based prognostic stratification and individualized therapeutic decision-making. Accordingly, this narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the disease concept, pathophysiology, molecular alterations, clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, treatment strategies, and future directions of endometrial carcinoma arising in adenomyosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.