Evidence mapPaperPMID 41909366Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Weight Regain After GLP-1-Based Therapy Discontinuation: Failure, Physiology, or Follow-Up Gap.

Andres F Quimbayo-Cifuentes

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andres F Quimbayo-CifuentesClinical Epidemiology, Universidad Instituto Colombiano de Estudios Superiores de Incolda (ICESI), Santiago de Cali, COL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual incretin agonists targeting both the GIP and GLP-1 receptors (GIP/GLP-1 dual agonists) has reshaped obesity management, approaching degrees of weight loss previously achievable largely through metabolic surgery. However, randomized withdrawal trials, including Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) 4 and SURMOUNT 4, show that discontinuation of GLP-1-based therapy is consistently followed by rapid weight regain (typically observed within one year of withdrawal) and a decline in cardiometabolic benefits. Rather than indicating therapeutic failure, this pattern is best understood as disease recurrence, reinforcing obesity as a chronic, relapsing condition. After treatment is discontinued, homeostatic weight-defense mechanisms re-emerge, favoring a return toward the pre-treatment set point. This editorial examines the biology underpinning post-discontinuation weight regain and highlights a clinically underappreciated consequence: sarcopenic obesity, driven by preferential fat mass recovery relative to lean mass. It also discusses mitigation strategies, including resistance training and structured tapering approaches, and argues for long-term, maintenance-oriented care as an ethical imperative in chronic obesity management.

Indexed as

glp-1 receptor agonistsobesityobesity treatmentoverweight and obesityrebound effect

Identifiers

PMID41909366
PMCPMC13031337

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.