ArticleCureus2026
The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in Reducing Anxiety Among Emergency Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnxiety and burnout are common among emergency department (ED) healthcare professionals. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) may offer an on-demand, feasible strategy to support staff well-being in high-pressure settings. We evaluated whether an immersive projection-based IVR program was associated with changes in anxiety, burnout, perceived stress, and physiological stress markers in ED professionals.
methodsWe conducted a prospective within-subject, quasi-experimental study in a hospital ED. Of 198 eligible professionals, 131 enrolled. The study followed a fixed sequence: a four-week IVR phase (four weekly 20-minute sessions using the MK360 immersive projection system), an eight-week washout, and a four-week control phase (four 20-minute "usual rest" sessions). Emotional outcomes were assessed at baseline and end-of-phase for both IVR and control using the Goldberg Anxiety Scale (GAS; prior 15 days), Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), and Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14; prior month). Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured immediately pre/post each session.
resultsSixty-seven participants completed all sessions and assessments. The mean GAS decreased during the IVR phase (4.0±3.2 to 3.2±3.2; p<0.05), while changes in MBI-HSS subscales and PSS-14 were small and not statistically significant. At the end of the IVR phase, 25.4% reported feeling emotionally better, and none reported feeling worse. During the control phase, the mean GAS showed a smaller decrease (2.9±2.9 to 2.6±2.9), and 17.9% reported feeling better, while 4.5% reported feeling worse. Across IVR sessions, pre-post reductions were observed in HR and systolic BP in several sessions, whereas changes during usual rest were generally smaller and less consistent.
conclusionIn this fixed-sequence, within-subject study, an immersive projection-based IVR program was associated with reduced self-reported anxiety and acute decreases in selected physiological stress markers among ED professionals. Findings should be interpreted in light of attrition and potential period effects; further controlled studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.