Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41909405›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Quantitative Percussion Diagnostics (QPD): Seeing What the Eye Can't With Objective Structural Data.

Cherilyn G Sheets, James C Earthman, Gregori M Kurtzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cherilyn G SheetsDentistry, Private Practice, Newport Beach, USA.
James C EarthmanBioengineering, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Gregori M KurtzmanGeneral Dentistry, Private Practice, Silver Spring, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Clinical assessment of the structural integrity of teeth, restorations, and dental implants remains largely subjective, relying on radiographs, tactile evaluation, and unmeasured percussion. These methods often fail to identify early biomechanical or adhesive failure, allowing deterioration to progress asymptomatically until fracture, restoration failure, or implant complications occur. An objective, radiation-free diagnostic method capable of identifying early micromobility may improve preventive and restorative outcomes. This article is a narrative review of Quantitative Percussion Diagnostics (QPD™) and its applications in clinical practice in improving diagnostics that are not evident radiographically or with standard examination methods. Methods This review describes the clinical principles and applications of an FDA-cleared diagnostic system utilizing QPD™ to measure overall and internal mobility of teeth and implants. The system applies a brief, controlled mechanical impulse and analyzes the resulting response using two quantitative metrics: a mobility score reflecting overall micromobility of the site, and the normal fit error (NFE) reflecting localized internal micromobility of the site. Representative clinical cases demonstrate applications in crack detection, evaluation of failing restorations, implant stability assessment, monitoring of osseointegration, periodontal screening, occlusal overload assessment, and post-endodontic evaluation. Results As reported in over 30 peer-reviewed multidisciplinary studies in dental, engineering, and computer science journals, QPD™ identifies early structural compromise, including cracks, adhesive failure, internal restoration breakdown, implant component instability, and early biomechanical overload, that was not evident on routine radiographic or clinical examination. Quantitative measurements enabled baseline establishment, longitudinal monitoring, and objective confirmation of treatment outcomes following restorative, occlusal, periodontal, and implant interventions. Incorporation into routine examinations and hygiene visits was feasible without increasing chairside time. Conclusions QPD™ provides an objective, reproducible, and radiation-free approach for evaluating the structural integrity of teeth, restorations, and implants. This is based on decades of research from broad interdisciplinary teams of dentists, engineers, data scientists, and statisticians. By detecting early micromobility before the onset of clinical symptoms, this technology supports a preventive diagnostic paradigm, facilitates minimally invasive intervention, enhances patient communication, and contributes to improved long-term restorative and implant success.

Indexed as

failing restorationsimplant stability assessmentnormal fit error (nfe)objective dental diagnosticsquantitative percussion diagnostics (qpd™)tooth and implant micro-mobility

Identifiers

PMID41909405
PMCPMC13028958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.