ReviewBiophysical reviews2026
Advances in molecular dynamics approaches for investigating cell-penetrating peptides.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms using computational electrophysiology simulations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane active peptides (MAPs) are short, cationic peptides capable of interacting with biological membranes, often altering their structure or function. Two of the most important classes of MAPs are cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), which can translocate cellular membranes without causing cytotoxicity, and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), peptides that can disrupt microbial membranes through pore formation or membrane lysis. Despite extensive experimental research, a comprehensive understanding of CPPs' mechanism at the molecular level remains elusive. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer a powerful approach to investigate protein-lipid interactions and the dynamic behavior of peptide-membrane systems at atomic resolution. Nonetheless, capturing these complex processes through conventional MD simulations is computationally demanding. To address this, a range of enhancing sampling techniques has been developed. In this review, we discuss the MD methodologies available for studying CPPs' interactions with membranes, focusing on the techniques introduced by our group. Our aim is to provide a useful reference for future investigations into peptide-membrane interactions, ultimately advancing molecular-level insight into these biologically significant systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.