ReviewArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2026
Linguistic Barriers in U.S. Neuropsychological Assessment: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the USA, 67.86 million people speak a language other than English at home. Many of these homes speak both English and a non-English language, with varying degrees of English fluency. A sizable 25.70 million people (8% of the U.S. population) report speaking, reading, or writing English "less than well" or "not at all." These individuals are referred to as limited English proficiency (LEP) speakers. Such persons often need speech interpreters in health care and human service settings. When a speech interpreter is utilized to assess a LEP patient, the typical dyadic clinician-patient interaction shifts to a triadic clinician-interpreter-patient interaction. Although triadic interpreter-mediated interactions are commonplace in neuropsychological assessment when LEP patients are being evaluated, few guidelines exist for these interactions. To illustrate the current state of interpreter-mediated neuropsychological assessment in the USA, literature on the following themes have been reviewed: (1) existing language accessibility options; (2) the history of speech interpretation, clinically; (3) key distinctions in the profile of U.S. patients; (4) what linguistics barriers exist, have been addressed, and have arisen from the implementation of language accommodations in clinical practice; and (5) what recommendations have been established for the neuropsychological assessment of LEP patients. By detailing these five areas in the context of local, state, and national-level variability, this review identifies some of the systemic roots of linguistic barriers in the USA. Updated recommendation guidelines are outlined to promote efficacious and equitable neuropsychological assessment of LEP patients for implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.