ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Characterising oral microbial signatures for periodontal disease in the NHANES population.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to characterise the relationship between the oral microbiota and periodontal disease (PD) by leveraging the latest and largest oral microbiota database from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
methodsThis study represented a secondary analysis of publicly available data from the NHANES 2009-2012 cycle. Within this dataset, subjects with PD and periodontally healthy controls were identified. Oral rinse samples were collected by the original NHANES study, which also performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification targeting the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene, sequencing, and subsequent construction of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) tables with taxonomic classification using the SILVA reference database. Venn diagram was generated to illustrate the overlap of differentially relative abundant genera identified by the Wilcoxon test, STAMP, and Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). These results were integrated to calculate the Microbial Dysbiosis Index (MDI). To reliably distinguish PD, four supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was utilised to explain the model.
resultsA Venn diagram identified 19 core genera. Subjects in the case group exhibited a significantly higher MDI compared to controls (t = 8.536, P < 0.001), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.595 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.574-0.622). ML models, particularly XGBoost, demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC: 0.958, 95% CI: 0.950-0.966) for PD classification. SHAP analysis highlighted important microbial taxa, including Treponema_2 and Prevotella.
conclusionThis study comprehensively investigated the oral microbiota's association with PD, identifying potential biomarkers for diagnosis and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.