Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910667›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2026

Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure management: unraveling molecular mechanisms to improve patient selection in heart failure management.

Faro R Verelst, Lauranne Van Assche, Ward Heggermont, Sander Trenson, Wim Huybrechts, Hein Heidbuchel, Andreas B Gevaert, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faro R VerelstDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Lauranne Van AsscheDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Ward HeggermontCardiovascular Research Center, A Zorg Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Sander TrensonDepartment of Cardiology, Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
Wim HuybrechtsDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Hein HeidbuchelDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Andreas B GevaertDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Emeline M Van CraenenbroeckDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium. Emeline.Vancraenenbroeck@uza.be.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 programme EHRA-PATHS, 945260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing patients with heart failure remains continues to be a global health challenge despite advances in medical therapy. For patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) represents a promising device-based therapeutic alternative. CCM delivers non-excitatory, high-voltage electrical impulses during the absolute refractory period of the cardiac cycle, thereby enhancing myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen demand. Clinical studies have shown that CCM can improve exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function. However, its long-term effects on mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in the diverse patient populations ranging from end-stage HFrEF to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, remain inconclusive. This review explores the underlying molecular mechanisms of CCM contributing to reverse cardiac remodeling, including improved intracellular calcium handling, phosphorylation of key proteins related to contractility, and reversal of maladaptive gene expression. We also highlight the results of clinical trials using CCM and emphasize the need for improved patient selection criteria. Early identification of potential responders may be based on left ventricular ejection fraction and fibrosis burden. Furthermore, the expanding role of CCM in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and specific cardiomyopathies underscores its evolving therapeutic potential. Future research should focus on large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish efficacy on hard clinical endpoints and evaluate long-term benefits, alongside targeted studies aimed at refining patient selection.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMyocardial ContractionPatient SelectionVentricular Function, LeftVentricular RemodelingExercise ToleranceHumansQuality of LifeStroke VolumeCardiac contractility modulationCardiomyopathyDevice therapyElectrophysiologyHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID41910667
PMCPMC13035672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.