ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure management: unraveling molecular mechanisms to improve patient selection in heart failure management.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Managing patients with heart failure remains continues to be a global health challenge despite advances in medical therapy. For patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) represents a promising device-based therapeutic alternative. CCM delivers non-excitatory, high-voltage electrical impulses during the absolute refractory period of the cardiac cycle, thereby enhancing myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen demand. Clinical studies have shown that CCM can improve exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function. However, its long-term effects on mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in the diverse patient populations ranging from end-stage HFrEF to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, remain inconclusive. This review explores the underlying molecular mechanisms of CCM contributing to reverse cardiac remodeling, including improved intracellular calcium handling, phosphorylation of key proteins related to contractility, and reversal of maladaptive gene expression. We also highlight the results of clinical trials using CCM and emphasize the need for improved patient selection criteria. Early identification of potential responders may be based on left ventricular ejection fraction and fibrosis burden. Furthermore, the expanding role of CCM in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and specific cardiomyopathies underscores its evolving therapeutic potential. Future research should focus on large-scale randomized controlled trials to establish efficacy on hard clinical endpoints and evaluate long-term benefits, alongside targeted studies aimed at refining patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.