Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41910682›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026

Using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies.

Amanda K Montoya, Shiloh Cleveland, Kathleen Lamarque-Navarette, Kimberly Brown, Jennifer A Sumner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda K MontoyaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. akmontoya@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-8184
Shiloh ClevelandDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2573-1737
Kathleen Lamarque-NavaretteDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Kimberly BrownDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Jennifer A SumnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-7171

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001881NHLBI Division of Intramural Research R01HL139614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multigroup cohort studies are used to compare exposed and unexposed groups on important outcomes. Recruitment for these studies can be done simultaneously or sequentially. When recruitment is simultaneous, there are many advanced statistical techniques, including propensity score matching, that can be used to select balanced groups to account for confounders of the effect of the exposure on the outcome. This paper presents a novel method for using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment using a five-step modular approach: (1) estimate propensity scores, (2) create propensity clusters, (3) match participants, (4) create holdout groups, and (5) enroll. These steps are repeated each recruitment period. We explain each step, providing R code to assist researchers in implementation, then demonstrate the performance of the method in a multigroup cohort study examining the effects of posttraumatic stress disorder on cardiovascular risk markers among trauma-exposed individuals. The method performed well and improved balance compared to using no selection technique, and it also performed similarly to propensity score matching with simultaneous recruitment. This method provides a novel approach to sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies. Future research should explore how more sophisticated methods for selecting covariates, generating propensity scores, and selecting matches could improve this method further.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionPropensity ScoreCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesHumansStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticCohort StudiesPropensity ScorePropensity Score MatchingRecruitment Methods

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.