ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026
Using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data analysis for behavioral medicine: an introduction to the special issue.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multigroup cohort studies are used to compare exposed and unexposed groups on important outcomes. Recruitment for these studies can be done simultaneously or sequentially. When recruitment is simultaneous, there are many advanced statistical techniques, including propensity score matching, that can be used to select balanced groups to account for confounders of the effect of the exposure on the outcome. This paper presents a novel method for using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment using a five-step modular approach: (1) estimate propensity scores, (2) create propensity clusters, (3) match participants, (4) create holdout groups, and (5) enroll. These steps are repeated each recruitment period. We explain each step, providing R code to assist researchers in implementation, then demonstrate the performance of the method in a multigroup cohort study examining the effects of posttraumatic stress disorder on cardiovascular risk markers among trauma-exposed individuals. The method performed well and improved balance compared to using no selection technique, and it also performed similarly to propensity score matching with simultaneous recruitment. This method provides a novel approach to sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies. Future research should explore how more sophisticated methods for selecting covariates, generating propensity scores, and selecting matches could improve this method further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41910682What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.