ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Health technology assessment system in Tanzania: Is it a championing system or still a system lagging behind?
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National HTA system in Canada: From system analysis and understanding to system strengthening.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a cost-effective solution that decreases inefficiencies and improper investments in health systems. Tanzania has made remarkable efforts in the field of HTA with the establishment of the national HTA committee in 2017; yet, literature on its institutionalization is limited. Using a systems thinking and analytical approach, this study examined Tanzania's HTA system, focusing on conceptualization, management, implementation, capacity, and use in policy and decision-making. The study was conducted between 2021 and 2023, purposely targeting experts and organizations involved in HTA. Six national HTA experts participated in virtual In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) of HTA from a policy perspective, and eight members of HTA-associated organizations from governmental and non-governmental sectors. Each organization completed one electronic institutional survey to understand HTA from a technical perspective. Findings from both data sources were consistent; half (n = 4) of the participating organisations surveyed affirmed an understanding of the HTA, but the majority showed limited knowledge of a central HTA agency or formal process. The Ministry of Health (MOH) is the main recipient of the HTA reports. Sustainable funding allocated for HTA is limited, and it is irregularly funded by private companies. Key values included safety, cost, economic evaluation, feasibility considerations, and community acceptability. HTA reports were used to inform clinical guidance, healthcare coverage, and pricing decisions. Experts identified the need to strengthen HTA awareness, advocacy, implementation, and institutionalization, supported by political commitment and inclusive governance. Strengthening the Tanzanian national HTA system through a more inclusive national body is essential to address these challenges.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.