Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911269›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Health technology assessment system in Tanzania: Is it a championing system or still a system lagging behind?

Mwifadhi Mrisho, Fakih S Bakar, Mohammed Alkhaldi, Patience Vimbayi Mushamiri-Kuzviwanza, Aisha Al Basuoni, Line Enjalbert, Rima Kachach, Maya Hassan, Marcel Tanner, Sara Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mwifadhi MrishoHealth System Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2880-2705
Fakih S BakarHealth System Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8644-2499
Mohammed AlkhaldiDepartment of Public Health, School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5609-3806
Patience Vimbayi Mushamiri-KuzviwanzaSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3901-0244
Aisha Al BasuoniProjects Unit, Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, Gaza, Palestine.
Line EnjalbertFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill, University, Montreal.
Rima KachachFaculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7203-461X
Maya HassanFaculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-3154
Marcel TannerDepartment of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sara AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill, University, Montreal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a cost-effective solution that decreases inefficiencies and improper investments in health systems. Tanzania has made remarkable efforts in the field of HTA with the establishment of the national HTA committee in 2017; yet, literature on its institutionalization is limited. Using a systems thinking and analytical approach, this study examined Tanzania's HTA system, focusing on conceptualization, management, implementation, capacity, and use in policy and decision-making. The study was conducted between 2021 and 2023, purposely targeting experts and organizations involved in HTA. Six national HTA experts participated in virtual In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) of HTA from a policy perspective, and eight members of HTA-associated organizations from governmental and non-governmental sectors. Each organization completed one electronic institutional survey to understand HTA from a technical perspective. Findings from both data sources were consistent; half (n = 4) of the participating organisations surveyed affirmed an understanding of the HTA, but the majority showed limited knowledge of a central HTA agency or formal process. The Ministry of Health (MOH) is the main recipient of the HTA reports. Sustainable funding allocated for HTA is limited, and it is irregularly funded by private companies. Key values included safety, cost, economic evaluation, feasibility considerations, and community acceptability. HTA reports were used to inform clinical guidance, healthcare coverage, and pricing decisions. Experts identified the need to strengthen HTA awareness, advocacy, implementation, and institutionalization, supported by political commitment and inclusive governance. Strengthening the Tanzanian national HTA system through a more inclusive national body is essential to address these challenges.

Identifiers

PMID41911269
PMCPMC13035126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.