ArticleCancer research communications2026
Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma Reveals Biological Heterogeneity and Molecular Classification Challenges.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-grade endometrial carcinoma exhibits marked histologic diversity, yet its molecular basis and the potential contribution of transcriptomic phenotyping to molecular classification remain incompletely understood. To address this, we performed whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing on 81 high-grade endometrial carcinomas, including serous, clear cell, grade 3 endometrioid, and carcinosarcoma. Tumors were assigned to molecular subtypes (POLE-ultramutated, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), TP53-mutated (TP53-mut), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), based on The Cancer Genome Atlas and ProMisE frameworks. Transcriptomic phenotypes were identified by unsupervised clustering of gene expression and analyzed in relation to histology, molecular subtypes, immune-related gene expression, and clinical outcomes. In this context, substantial discordance was observed among TP53 mutation status, p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC), and copy number-based classification in non-POLE/non-MSI-H tumors. Transcriptomic clustering identified three phenotypic groups linked to cell differentiation status: glandular/luminal, ciliated, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like (EMT-like). These phenotypes transcended molecular subtype boundaries. For example, TP53-mut tumors were distributed across both glandular/luminal and EMT-like phenotypes. The glandular/luminal phenotype was associated with elevated antigen presentation (e.g., HLA expression) and immune-related signaling, whereas the EMT-like phenotype, frequently observed in carcinosarcoma, was linked to stemness and metastatic potential. TP53-mut and NSMP were associated with poor prognosis in high-grade endometrial carcinoma, whereas the glandular/luminal phenotype was associated with better outcomes than the EMT-like phenotype, an effect largely influenced by carcinosarcoma prevalence. Transcriptomic phenotypes complement molecular subtypes in high-grade endometrial carcinoma, enhancing biological resolution and capturing clinically relevant heterogeneity. These results underscore persistent challenges of current molecular classification approaches, supporting the need for integrative strategies in high-grade disease. SIGNIFICANCE: High-grade endometrial carcinomas show marked heterogeneity. We demonstrate substantial discordance among TP53 mutation status, p53 IHC, and copy number-based assignment, alongside transcriptomic phenotypes spanning molecular subtypes. These findings provide a foundation for developing improved classification approaches to better interpret the heterogeneous molecular landscape of high-grade disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.