Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41911436›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Additional Investigations and Referrals by Primary Care Physicians in Uncertain Clinical Situations: Cross-Sectional Study Using Virtual Patient-Based Scenarios.

Mathieu Lorenzo, Thierry Pelaccia, Emmanuel Triby, Yunus Can, Romain Krider, Hubert Maisonneuve, Nicolas Fernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathieu LorenzoDepartment of General Medicine and Territorial Training, Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery, and Health Sciences, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kischleger, Strasbourg, 67085, France, 33 03 68 85 34 55.ORCID 0000-0002-4597-4621
Thierry PelacciaCenter for Training and Research in Health Sciences Education (CFRPS), Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery, and Health Sciences, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-5428
Emmanuel TribyFaculty of Education and Lifelong Learning (ESPE), University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1621-1809
Yunus CanDepartment of General Medicine and Territorial Training, Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery, and Health Sciences, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kischleger, Strasbourg, 67085, France, 33 03 68 85 34 55.ORCID 0009-0003-0585-446X
Romain KriderDepartment of General Medicine and Territorial Training, Faculty of Medicine, Midwifery, and Health Sciences, University of Strasbourg, 4 rue Kischleger, Strasbourg, 67085, France, 33 03 68 85 34 55.ORCID 0009-0001-2174-7598
Hubert MaisonneuveUniversity Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-1122
Nicolas FernandezCenter for Applied Pedagogy in Health Sciences (CPASS), University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-2641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty affects at least 20% of primary care consultations, possibly leading primary care physicians to order additional investigations or referrals, affecting cost-effectiveness and patient safety. Experience is a key determinant in making these orders, along with anxiety or physicians' reactions to uncertainty. Past studies addressing the links between experience and additional investigations and referrals in uncertain situations have used questionnaires, database analyses, or interviews with general practitioners, but no study has used fully standardized conditions. Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between experience and orders for additional investigations and referrals in uncertain situations using a standardized virtual patient simulation. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 40 physicians stratified by sex and experience (<10 vs ≥10 years). Participants engaged in a simulated clinical scenario involving a man aged 69 years with atypical dyspnea designed to evoke diagnostic uncertainty. The virtual patient was presented via first-person video to assess the physicians' decision-making process. Participants' years of clinical experience, sex, age, place of practice, type of practice, number of in-office patients, duration of consultations, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y) and Physician Reaction to Uncertainty scores, and diagnostic hypotheses were collected and analyzed using multivariate regression models. Results: The group with <10 years of experience had higher STAI-Y (mean 41.3, SD 6.8 vs mean 32.7, SD 8.2; P<.001) and Physician Reaction to Uncertainty (mean 20.7, SD 5.4 vs mean 14.4, SD 6.9; P=.002) scores. Participants with <10 years of professional experience ordered more additional investigations and referrals on average: 10.2 (SD 3.4; 95% CI 8.9-11.7) vs 8.1 (SD 3.7; 95% CI 6.5-9.9; P=.03). There was no effect on costs: €153.80 (US $173.45) vs €129.60 (US $146.16) (effect size 0.296, 95% CI -0.348 to 0.939; P=.23). Multivariate analysis showed an association between the number of additional investigations and referrals with age (relative risk 0.980, 95% CI 0.963-0.997; adjusted P=.02) and mean STAI-Y score (relative risk 0.984, 95% CI 0.968-0.999; adjusted P=.04) but not with experience (<10 vs ≥10 years; R2=0.308). Conclusions: Less experienced physicians do not appear to overly rely on additional investigations and referrals in uncertain situations, suggesting that clinical reasoning remains a well-preserved skill among the younger generation of physicians. Future research could explore interventions targeting physicians' anxiety and tolerance to uncertainty as potential factors influencing requests for additional investigations and referrals. In practical terms, two avenues could be explored: specific training for supervisors to help them address uncertainty tolerance in the feedback they provide to trainees and the use of virtual consultations as a complement to traditional training, with particular attention to this aspect.

Indexed as

Physicians, Primary CareReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SimulationSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyclinical decision-makingdiagnostic testspatient simulationprimary care anxietyreferral and consultationuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41911436
PMCPMC13035073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.