Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912264›Full record

ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026

Rationale and Design of the MIA Trial: A Proof-of-Concept Study of Minimally Invasive Autopsy in an Infectious Cause of Death in a Scandinavian ICU Setting.

Fridtjof Gjerdrum Helgesen, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Camilla Musaeus Donato, Ulf Gøttrup Pedersen, Thomas Hildebrandt, Xiaohui Chen Nielsen, Eric Santoni-Rugiu, Gro Linno Willemoe, Lothar Wiese, Henning Bay Nielsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fridtjof Gjerdrum HelgesenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1489-8915
Birgitte Grønkær ToftDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla Musaeus DonatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.
Ulf Gøttrup PedersenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.
Thomas HildebrandtDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.
Xiaohui Chen NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.
Eric Santoni-RugiuDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gro Linno WillemoeDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lothar WieseDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.
Henning Bay NielsenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains a challenge to obtain well-preserved tissue samples from deceased patients as access to regular autopsy is limited. Minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is a potential alternative to the complete diagnostic autopsy because of its efficacy in providing non-autolyzed tissue samples and its increased acceptability amongst the bereaved. The study follows an exploratory, prospective design without any kind of intervention. Inclusion criteria are deceased adults (≥ 18 years), confirmed signs of death, uncertain or multifactorial cause of death, present or previous infection, and permission from next of kin to perform MIA, defined by ultrasound (US)-guided samples from the heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys using a TruCut semi-automatic coaxial needle (14G; 16 cm length). Tissue samples, fixed in BiopSafe 20 mL formalin test tubes, are sent for pathological evaluation. The primary outcome is the achievement of well-preserved tissue samples, representative of the target organ and suitable for histopathological evaluation and diagnosis. An exploratory outcome is to establish the degree of clinico-pathological discrepancies between pre-mortem clinical status and post-mortem pathological descriptions. This investigator-initiated study is designed to validate the feasibility of MIA to enable fast-track post-mortem evaluation in an ICU environment.

Indexed as

AutopsyCause of DeathHumansIntensive Care UnitsProof of Concept StudyProspective StudiesAutopsyMIAMinimallyMITSPost‐mortem

Identifiers

PMID41912264
PMCPMC13035448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.