ArticleScientific reports2026
Consumer credit evaluation model for free trade ports by a sparse attention transformer and graph neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional credit evaluation models often struggle to model long behavioral sequences and complex relational risks. To overcome these limitations, this study proposed a hybrid deep learning framework named Sparse Attention Transformer and Graph Neural Network (SAT-GNN). The framework incorporated a Sparse Attention Transformer (SAT) to capture dynamic risk patterns in ultra-long individual behavior sequences. It also integrated a Graph Attention Network (GAT) to model risk contagion within heterogeneous entity graphs. In addition, an adaptive feature fusion layer was designed to balance individual-level features and group-level topological representations through trainable weights. Experiments were conducted on the publicly available IEEE-CIS dataset. The proposed model achieved an AUC of 0.952 and an AUPRC of 0.835. Compared with the industry-standard model LightGBM, recall improved by 20.7%. Ablation studies confirmed the contribution of each core component. The average inference latency per sample was only 8.4 milliseconds. Overall, the proposed framework delivered high predictive accuracy and low latency in real-time financial decision-making scenarios. The study provides a robust and efficient solution for credit risk management in free trade ports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.