Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41912643›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Using machine learning algorithms to predict MACE in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Liping Xu, Yiqin Zhang, Ali Ameen Abbas Al-Janabi, Wenmei Chen, Qiongyi Zhang, Fang Cao, Fuyuan Hong, Miao Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liping XuDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Yiqin ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Ali Ameen Abbas Al-JanabiDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Wenmei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Qiongyi ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Fang CaoDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. 422512642@qq.com.
Fuyuan HongDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. Hongdoc@aliyun.com.
Miao LinDepartment of Nephrology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. mlinys@hotmail.com.

Funding

Innovation Joint Fund by Fujian Science and Technology Department 2024Y9084Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2024J011035Xiamen Medical and Health Guiding Project 3502Z20224ZD1257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to predict the risks of Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) with machine learning (ML) algorithm. In addition, we added the time factor and predicted the risk factors for MACE during the 1-year and 5-year follow-up. This retrospective study included 1006 PD patients from January 2010 to December 2016. XGBoost, Random Forest (RF) and Adaboost were used to train models for assessing risk of 1-year and 5-year MACE. The optimal ML algorithm was used to construct the models to predict the risk of the MACE end point. 409 patients developed MACE during the follow-up. The RF model (AUC = 0.80) was optimal for overall MACE prediction. The three most influential variables, ranked in descending order of importance were Parathyroid hormone, Congestive heart failure and Age.114 patients developed MACE during the first-year follow-up. The XGBoost model (AUC = 0.86) performed best for 1-year MACE. The three most influential variables, ranked in descending order of importance were High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Age and Calcium. 331 patients developed MACE during the 5-year follow-up. The RF model (AUC = 0.75) was the best predicting model for 5-year MACE. The three most influential variables, ranked in descending order of importance were Age, Creatinine and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate. We developed and validated a novel algorithm to predict the risk factors of MACE in PD patients.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMachine LearningPeritoneal DialysisAgedAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsMACEMachine learningPeritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID41912643
PMCPMC13039696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.