Evidence mapPaperPMID 41912973Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Blood pressure variability in the ATACH2 study: evaluating a target range.

Kendall Huntt, Aric Shadler, Abigail Leonhard, Rachael Scott, Justin F Fraser, Jessica Lee, Melissa Nestor, Adnan Qureshi, Aaron M Cook

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kendall HunttPharmacy Services, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aric ShadlerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, Lee T. Todd Jr. Building, Room 292, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone Ave., Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
Abigail LeonhardDr. Bing Zhang Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Science, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rachael ScottDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Justin F FraserDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jessica LeeDepartment of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Melissa NestorDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, Lee T. Todd Jr. Building, Room 292, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone Ave., Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
Adnan QureshiDepartment of Neurology, University of Missouri University Hospital, Columbia, MO, USA.
Aaron M CookDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, Lee T. Todd Jr. Building, Room 292, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S. Limestone Ave., Lexington, KY, 40508, USA. amcook0@uky.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure management after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a key part of early care to reduce complications and improve outcomes. Blood pressure variability (BPV) affects outcomes independently of achieving a specific goal. This study evaluated a novel method for describing variability—area under the curve (AUC)—and applied the guideline-suggested range for systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a prospective cohort previously studied. This was a post-hoc analysis of ATACH2 trial data. Variation outside the SBP range (130–150 mmHg) during the first 24 h was measured via AUC and compared to endpoints such as mortality, modified Rankin Score, and renal adverse effects. Multivariate regression analysis evaluated factors related to early neurologic outcome. 38.2% of SBP measurements were within the target range. Mean time to SBP nadir was 61 (SD 26.3) minutes, with a mean nadir SBP of 108.5 mmHg (SD 15.4). Median AUC in the standard cohort was 289 (IQR 188–400); in the intensive cohort, 291 (IQR 206–395, p = 0.478). Most of the AUC was below target in the intensive group and above in the standard group. Admission GCS, baseline NIHSS, and hematoma volume were significantly associated with poor 30-day outcomes; AUC outside the target SBP range was not (p = 0.569). SBP standard deviation (SD) and AUC showed modest correlation. AUC did not differ between cohorts and was not associated with neurologic outcome. Admission GCS, NIHSS, and hematoma volume were predictors of poor outcome after ICH.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCerebral HemorrhageAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensive agentsArea under curveBlood PressureIntracerebral HemorrhagesModified rankin scaleNeurologic outcome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.