Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913089›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026

Neurocognitive Profile of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Cognitive Flexibility, Delay Discounting, and Detail Orientation.

Iman K McPherson, Abigail G Dalton, Kelly Armstrong, Brittani Martino, Elisa Asanza, Kamryn T Eddy, Kendra R Becker, Debra L Franko, Lauren Breithaupt, Kelsie T Forbush and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Iman K McPhersonEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-964X
Abigail G DaltonEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4698-5175
Kelly ArmstrongMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8976-7466
Brittani MartinoMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5642-3127
Elisa AsanzaMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6423-7726
Kamryn T EddyEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-0930
Kendra R BeckerEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8946-9977
Debra L FrankoEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-5063
Lauren BreithauptEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kelsie T ForbushDepartment of Clinical Child Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5900-4204
Franziska PlessowMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9721-7817
Laura HolsenMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-7789
Elizabeth A LawsonMass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-3349
Jennifer J ThomasEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-581X

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUM1TR004408 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Lindsey Robert Baden, Lee Marshall Nadler · 2023 to 2026
$43.3M
ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Austen Lawson, Takara Leah Stanley · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Neurobiological Underpinnings of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in AdultsR01MH128246 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAURA McGrath HOLSEN, Elizabeth Austen Lawson · 2022 to 2026
$4.5M
The Role of Negative Affect in the Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: An Integrated Analysis of Neural Circuitry, Hormones, and Momentary Negative EmotionsK23MH125143 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BECKER, KENDRA R · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
Mentorship in Biobehavioral Mechanisms of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake DisorderK24MH135189 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JENNIFER JOANNE THOMAS · 2023 to 2026
$747k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004408NCATS NIH HHS UM1TR004408NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH125143NIMH NIH HHS K23MH125143NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH135189NIMH NIH HHS K24MH135189NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128246NIMH NIH HHS R01MH128246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeurocognitive deficits are well-documented across psychiatric disorders and may indicate novel treatment targets. However, empirical data on the neurocognitive profile of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) are lacking. To address this gap, this study examined three core neurocognitive domains altered in other eating disorders-cognitive flexibility, delay discounting, and detail orientation-in adults with ARFID and healthy controls (HCs).

methodAdults (18-45 years) with ARFID (n = 49) and HCs (n = 21) completed computerized tasks assessing cognitive flexibility (Category Switch Task), delay discounting (Delay Discounting Task), and detail orientation (Navon Task). We hypothesized that, relative to HCs, adults with ARFID would show poorer cognitive flexibility, steeper delay discounting, and greater detail orientation.

resultsCompared to HCs, adults with ARFID showed larger response-time switch costs (U = 9456, p = 0.023) but smaller error-rate switch costs (U = 6832, p = 0.044). Consequently, set-shifting efficiency did not differ between groups (inverse efficiency score switch costs: U = 537, p = 0.672), indicating an accuracy-over-speed strategy supporting cognitive flexibility in ARFID. No group differences emerged in delay discounting (U = 618, p = 0.091) or detail orientation (U = 8016, p = 0.938). Regression analyses indicated that ARFID phenotype severity explained variance in task performance: greater fear of aversive consequences was associated with better set-shifting (p = 0.005), and greater lack of interest with reduced delay discounting (p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Contrary to expectations, adults with ARFID matched HCs in overall cognitive flexibility efficiency by strategically slowing responses, challenging assumptions of innate cognitive rigidity. Future research should test whether interventions that increase processing speed while preserving accuracy could improve everyday adaptability and eating behaviors in ARFID.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderCognitionCognitive FlexibilityDelay DiscountingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultanorexia nervosaavoidant/restrictive food intake disordercognitive flexibilitydelay discountingdetail orientationfeeding and eating disordersimpulsivityneurocognitive functioningneuropsychologyset‐shifting

Identifiers

PMID41913089
PMCPMC13102356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.