ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
Quality management of comprehensive blood conservation strategies during cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) carries substantial transfusion requirements, exposing patients to increased risks of complications during hospital stay. This study evaluates the clinical impact of a quality-controlled, multimodal blood conservation strategy during CPB in pediatric cardiac surgery.
methodsWe collected the medical data of 9792 children (aged ≤ 14 years and weight > 10 kg) undergoing CPB cardiac surgery between September 2014 and December 2021. Since January 2016, the pediatric CPB center has implemented patient blood management. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups: conventional management group (premanagement, n = 1762) and patient blood management group (postmanagement, n = 8030). Compare blood transfusion and outcomes. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed.
results1760 matched patient pairs were obtained. Compared with the premanagement group, the postmanagement group demonstrated significant reduction in packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion rates (during hospital stay: 38.1% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.007; CPB: 18.2% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001), lower plasma transfusion rates (20.7% vs. 16.6%, p = 0.002), furthermore, decreased CPB priming volume (29.2 vs. 29.1 mL/kg, p = 0.042), lower incidence of postoperative liver injury (15.7% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001) and AKI (7.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.017).
conclusionsFollowing the postmanagement, comprehensive blood conservation strategies significantly reduce transfusion requirements and improve clinical outcomes for this vulnerable population, establishing an effective framework for blood resource utilization and safety during hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.