Observational studyDrug design, development and therapy2026
Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicenter Real-World Observational Study.
Observational study in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although Upadacitinib has proven success in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), there is less data on its efficacy and safety in Asian patients with refractory IBD. Methods: This multicenter study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA in patients with refractory IBD. This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis included adult refractory IBD patients who received UPA therapy at three tertiary hospitals from January 2023 to March 2025. Clinical, endoscopic, and laboratory outcomes were effectiveness goals. Safety measures included AEs and and rates of discontinuation. Results: A total of 80 eligible patients were enrolled, including 52 with CD and 28 with UC. During the induction period, for CD: steroid-free clinical remission: 59.6%; clinical response: 61.5%; endoscopic remission: 30.8%; endoscopic response: 57.7%. For UC, steroid-free clinical remission: 67.9%; clinical response: 71.4%; endoscopic remission: 46.4%; endoscopic response: 60.7%. In the maintenance phase (12 months), CD had 78.8% steroid-free clinical remission and 75.0% endoscopic remission. UC had 85.7% steroid-free clinical remission and 78.6% endoscopic remission. Inflammatory indicators and nutritional parameters improved significantly. The incidence of adverse events in CD and UC was 23.1% and 14.3%, respectively, and the discontinuation rates during the 12-month maintenance treatment period were 7.1% and 21.5%, respectively. The most common adverse reaction is acne (8.75%). Conclusion: UPA demonstrated robust real-world effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in Asian patients with refractory IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.