ArticleDigital health
Conjoint analysis of social inequality indicators in diet and physical activity app (non-)users: Representative online surveys in Austria, Germany and Italy.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile interventions for health promotion (mHealth) are promising behaviour change tools. Yet they are infrequently used, and research suggests that use may be unevenly distributed in the population, potentially widening existing health inequalities. Objective: This study tested for individual and joint associations between socio-demographic characteristics and nutrition and physical activity app use. Methodology: Nationally representative samples for Austria, Germany and Italy were recruited with Results: Except for residency and migration status, all socio-demographic characteristics were associated with mHealth app (non-)use if analysed independently. A latent class analysis revealed four distinct classes of mHealth app (non-)users. 'Young and diverse citizens' (characterised by young age and lowest proportion of heterosexuals) and 'economically strong employees' (characterised by highest levels of education and income) were more likely to use mHealth apps compared to 'established retirees' (characterised by largest share of retired individuals) and 'low-income workers' (characterised by lowest levels of education and income). Conclusion: Age, education, income and employment are crucial inequality indicators for mHealth app use. These results confirm the existence of a digital health divide in Europe that urgently needs addressing to promote digital health for all. Trial registration: https://osf.io/s2wya (Austria and Germany), https://osf.io/tpu2m (Italy).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.