ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Exclosure Enhances Crop Yields and Rural Livelihood Resilience in Northern Ethiopia.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethiopia's food production and rural livelihoods are increasingly threatened by land degradation and climate variability, particularly in dryland areas vulnerable to climatic shocks. Exclosure, a designated area shielded from human and animal disruption, has emerged as a vital restoration approach, especially in northern Ethiopia. Empirical studies have largely focused on ecological outcomes and have provided limited and mixed results on whether exclosure enhances agricultural productivity and livelihood diversification. This study addresses this gap by examining the effect of exclosure on crop yields and household livelihood diversification using panel data from 491 households gathered over two consecutive cropping years, across varying climate conditions. Fractional logit model, propensity score matching, and Hausman-Taylor estimations were employed to compare households living downstream of the exclosure with those in open grazing areas. The results indicate that households downstream of exclosures exhibit markedly greater livelihood diversification than those with open grazing areas, and this is influenced by age, gender, livestock ownership, extension services, financial availability, and access to marketing information. The analysis also reveals a positive effect of exclosure on crop yield per hectare, with more pronounced differences observed during drought conditions. Overall, the findings demonstrate that exclosure contributes not only to ecological restoration but also to stabilizing agricultural production, strengthening food security, and enhancing rural livelihoods resilience. The study provides empirical evidence to inform national and regional policy makers, practitioners, and land management planners of the benefits of exclosure as a restoration approach and supports their integration and scaling up in degraded and climate sensitive regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.