ReviewMolecular biomedicine2026
Cancer and aging: complex associations and therapeutic targets.
Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of cancer increases markedly with aging, and the two processes share underlying molecular mechanisms. In the context of global population aging and rising cancer incidence, nine convergent hallmark axes have been identified: genomic instability, epigenetic drift, inflammation-immunity imbalance, microbiome dysbiosis, metabolic reprogramming, telomere attrition, stem cell exhaustion, cellular senescence, and autophagy dysfunction. These hallmarks constitute an integrated regulatory network that operates synergistically, antagonistically, or through bidirectional feedback across molecular, cellular, and microenvironmental levels. Genomic instability, epigenetic remodeling, chronic inflammation, microbiome dysbiosis, and metabolic reprogramming in aging often act synergistically to promote tumorigenesis, whereas telomere attrition and stem cell exhaustion primarily exert antagonistic, tumor-suppressive effects. Cellular senescence and autophagy dysfunction display context-dependent dual roles. Importantly, this network framework has direct relevance to cancer therapeutics. Although chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy effectively suppress tumor progression, they frequently induce therapy-induced senescence, characterized by cell-cycle arrest and a senescence-associated secretory phenotype, thereby accelerating functional decline and increasing long-term toxicities in older patients. The proposed "synergistic-antagonistic-dual" framework linking aging and cancer not only helps explain the disproportionate cancer burden in older adults but also supports a "one drug, two targets" therapeutic paradigm. Targeting these shared pathways has delayed aging phenotypes and suppressed tumorigenesis in preclinical studies and early clinical trials, highlighting the potential of integrated interventions that concurrently address aging and cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.