ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Haemostatic changes during CART cell therapy and risk of complications.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy toxicity includes cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), but also thrombotic and haemorrhagic events. Given the link between haemostasis and inflammation, haemostatic biomarkers could help identify at-risk patients. Sixty-two adult patients receiving CD19- or BCMA-targeted CART were prospectively included and followed up for 30 days to characterize haemostatic changes and evaluate their association with the risk of CRS, ICANS, thrombosis and bleeding. Blood samples were collected at baseline (pre-lymphodepletion), pre-infusion and on days + 3, + 14, and + 28 post-infusion. Haemostatic tests, including thrombin generation assay (TGA, ST-Genesia) and P-Selectin, were performed. CRS occurred in 94% of patients, ICANS in 39%, venous thrombosis in 1.6%, and clinically relevant bleeding in 13%. During follow-up, prolonged coagulation times, thrombocytopenia and decreased fibrinogen and P-selectin, were noted. Baseline endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was associated with clinically relevant CRS risk (OR 12.39; p = 0.02) and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) with ICANS (OR 1.66; p < 0.01). Baseline P-selectin levels and platelet count identified patients at higher bleeding risk (OR 0.20; p = 0.03 and OR 0.39; p < 0.01, respectively). In the first month after CART infusion, bleeding incidence exceeds thrombosis. TGA, CRP, platelet count and P-selectin may help identify patients at risk of severe toxicity, enabling earlier, targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.