Evidence mapPaperPMID 41915360Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2026

Expert Consensus on the Rational Approach to Isotretinoin Usage for Effective Management of Acne: ERAISE ACNE Recommendations.

Sanjiv Kandhari, Jayakar Thomas, Niti Khunger, Maya Vedamurthy, Kiran Godse, Abir Saraswat, Nina Madnani, Vijay Somani, Sushil Tahiliani, Bela Shah and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sanjiv KandhariDepartment of Dermatology, Dr. Kandhari's Skin and Dental Clinic, New Delhi, India. skandhari21@gmail.com.
Jayakar ThomasDepartment of Dermatology, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-1788
Niti KhungerDepartment of Dermatology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-9974
Maya VedamurthyDepartment of Dermatology, Apollo Hospitals, RSV Skin and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-1513
Kiran GodseDepartment of Dermatology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre & Shree Skin Centre & Pathology Laboratory, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0550-5871
Abir SaraswatDepartment of Dermatology, Indushree Skin Clinic, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-2080
Nina MadnaniDepartment of Dermatology, P. D. Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Sir H. N. Reliance Foundation Hospital, and Dr. Nina Madnani's Skin and Hair Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3194-9721
Vijay SomaniDepartment of Dermatology, Dermatrendz, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-3198
Sushil TahilianiDepartment of Dermatology, Dr. Tahiliani's Clinic/P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-1067
Bela ShahDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, B. J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1138-7266
C R SrinivasDepartment of Dermatology, PSG Hospitals, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, 641004, Tamil Nadu, India.
Asit MittalDepartment of Dermatology, R.N.T. Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7202-6654
Mukesh GirdharDepartment of Dermatology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8022-8448
Maleeka SachdevaDepartment of Dermatology, Sachdev Clinics, Chandigarh, Punjab and Haryana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7697-7532
Sachin VarmaDepartment of Dermatology, Skinvita Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Manjunath ShenoyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-9623
Shyamanta BaruaDepartment of Dermatology, Assam Medical College & Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-6930
Abhishek DeDepartment of Dermatology, CNMC Kolkata and Skin Care Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-2430
Akshay JainDepartment of Dermatology, Follicle Skin Clinic, Kota, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-746X
Aseem SharmaDepartment of Dermatology, Skin Saga Centre for Dermatology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-227X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral isotretinoin remains the gold standard for severe acne, with expanding use in broader subtypes. However, clinical practice varies across regions in terms of dosing, monitoring, and adjunctive care. A consensus was developed by 20 dermatology experts through a modified Delphi process and literature review (2000-2024) to provide practical recommendations. High consensus supported first-line isotretinoin among adults for severe acne variants (conglobata, nodulocystic, and papulopustular), acne with scarring or psychological distress, and moderate acne featuring frequent relapse, significant scarring, strong family history, and marked psychosocial burden. Similar agreement was achieved for adolescents (12-18 years). High consensus supported isotretinoin for special clinical scenarios, including treatment-resistant acne, gram-negative folliculitis, and acne fulminans. Early initiation was favored to prevent acne progression and scarring, with high agreement on quality-of-life improvement with isotretinoin use. Conventional dosing (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) was preferred for severe acne forms; low-dose (0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day) was acceptable for moderate/persistent acne. The consensus acknowledged common adverse effects, less frequent systemic effects, and the well-established teratogenic risk of isotretinoin. Laboratory monitoring, especially in metabolic risk, was advised. Low consensus persisted around cumulative dosing, laboratory testing frequency, and duration of posttreatment washout before pregnancy. The Expert consensus on the Rational Approach to ISotretinoin usage for Effective management of ACNE (ERAISE ACNE) algorithm offers a practical guide for isotretinoin use in Indian clinical practice, emphasizing early initiation, tailored dosing, safety-focused monitoring, and is applicable to settings with similar patient demographics and challenges.

Indexed as

Acne vulgarisConsensusDelphi techniqueDermatologistsIndiaIsotretinoin

Identifiers

PMID41915360
PMCPMC13237421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.