ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Expert Consensus on the Rational Approach to Isotretinoin Usage for Effective Management of Acne: ERAISE ACNE Recommendations.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral isotretinoin remains the gold standard for severe acne, with expanding use in broader subtypes. However, clinical practice varies across regions in terms of dosing, monitoring, and adjunctive care. A consensus was developed by 20 dermatology experts through a modified Delphi process and literature review (2000-2024) to provide practical recommendations. High consensus supported first-line isotretinoin among adults for severe acne variants (conglobata, nodulocystic, and papulopustular), acne with scarring or psychological distress, and moderate acne featuring frequent relapse, significant scarring, strong family history, and marked psychosocial burden. Similar agreement was achieved for adolescents (12-18 years). High consensus supported isotretinoin for special clinical scenarios, including treatment-resistant acne, gram-negative folliculitis, and acne fulminans. Early initiation was favored to prevent acne progression and scarring, with high agreement on quality-of-life improvement with isotretinoin use. Conventional dosing (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) was preferred for severe acne forms; low-dose (0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day) was acceptable for moderate/persistent acne. The consensus acknowledged common adverse effects, less frequent systemic effects, and the well-established teratogenic risk of isotretinoin. Laboratory monitoring, especially in metabolic risk, was advised. Low consensus persisted around cumulative dosing, laboratory testing frequency, and duration of posttreatment washout before pregnancy. The Expert consensus on the Rational Approach to ISotretinoin usage for Effective management of ACNE (ERAISE ACNE) algorithm offers a practical guide for isotretinoin use in Indian clinical practice, emphasizing early initiation, tailored dosing, safety-focused monitoring, and is applicable to settings with similar patient demographics and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.