ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Tracking daily activities with ecological momentary assessment: A bibliometric analysis of current use in health Mapping daily activities with ecological momentary assessment.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ecological Momentary Assessment of Daily Activities in Individuals With Neurological Disorders: Scoping Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health research has shifted from a disease-centered approach towards emphasizing functioning and more specific lived health. Lived health, the actual performance of daily activities in one's environment, has nevertheless received limited attention, and its assessment remains methodologically challenging. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), a real-time method capturing behaviors, emotions, and context in natural settings, holds promise in this regard. Although EMA research is increasing, insight into its use for studying daily activities is still limited. To address this gap, this study systematically maps EMA applications across diverse health and disability populations to better understand lived health, defined as actual engagement in daily activities. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using a literature search on Web of Science with keywords related to EMA combined with daily activity terms, yielding 3,692 English-language articles. Publications were classified according to general characteristics, distribution of disability and health populations, actual engagement in daily activities following the person-environment-occupational model (PEO-model), and interaction analyses combining the last two analyses. The results show that mental disorders dominate the EMA research on daily activities, representing 75% of the dataset, which has significantly shaped the overall research landscape. Moreover, while personal factors are frequently highlighted, occupational and environmental dimensions remain underrepresented. These findings suggest that future EMA research should better integrate aspects of person, occupation, and environment, for instance by using tools such as geolocation and passive sensing to capture daily functioning more holistically. Expanding research beyond mental health and increasing secondary analyses will further strengthen the relevance and impact of EMA on health research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.