ReviewGlobal spine journal2026
Early Diagnosis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectivesDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) or cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a progressive neurological condition linked to cervical degeneration, often presenting with a wide range of symptoms that complicate diagnosis. This study aims to identify clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological measures that aid in early DCM diagnosis.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines a systematic review was performed. Literature from PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2025 was analyzed. Search terms included "degenerative cervical myelopathy", "cervical spondylotic myelopathy", "CSM", "Early clinical signs", "Diffusion Tensor Imaging", "Fractional anisotropy", "Motor-evoked potentials", "Sensory-evoked potentials". The included studies primarily focused on clinical examinations, radiological imaging, and electrophysiological tests to detect early signs of DCM.ResultsA total of 36 met the inclusion criteria, involving 4596 patients. Tests for "myelopathy hand" signs showed high negative predictive values in excluding DCM. Lower limb assessments, such as the ten-second step test and Rossolimo reflex, also showed promise for early diagnosis. Among imaging techniques, DTI outperformed traditional T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Kinematic CT myelography (CMCT) also demonstrated potential for early detection. Electrophysiological tests, including SEPs and MEPs, provided valuable insights into disease severity when performed both statically and dynamically.ConclusionsDCM's variable profile complicates diagnosis. This review highlights the importance of underused clinical evaluations for earlier detection, with DTI showing promise for early changes and preventive use. Electrophysiological measures, non-invasive and accurate, should be integrated alongside dynamic evaluations for a comprehensive, multi-modal diagnostic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.