ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Multidisciplinary Treatment With Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Major Vascular Invasion: Prospective Registry Protocol.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systemic therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, has improved survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy remains limited in patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), a subgroup with an extremely poor prognosis. Although combining immunotherapy with local treatments such as hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and radiation therapy (RT) is considered a promising approach, robust supportive evidence from routine clinical practice is lacking. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the safety and therapeutic effectiveness of a multidisciplinary treatment strategy involving RT after HAIC, followed by immunotherapy, in patients with MVI-positive HCC, using real-world clinical data from Japan. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter registry study conducted at 3 hospitals in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Eligible patients will have unresectable MVI-positive HCC confirmed by dynamic computed tomography. The treatment protocol follows a standardized sequence: 1 session of HAIC (cisplatin), RT targeting the MVI site (25 Gy in 5 fractions), and subsequent systemic immunotherapy. The primary end point is safety, which will be evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). The secondary end points include progression-free survival at 12 and 24 weeks, tumor response, median progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate at 12 and 24 weeks, assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Data will be collected prospectively and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Patient enrollment began in March 2025, and data collection and analysis are ongoing as participants continue to be followed. Conclusions: This prospective registry study will generate real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of a multidisciplinary strategy combining HAIC, RT, and immunotherapy in patients with MVI-positive HCC. Given that all components are covered under Japan's national health insurance, this approach could be readily implemented in clinical practice and may inform future treatment guidelines for MVI-positive HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.