Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41916682›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2026

Women's Autonomy in Obstetric Care: A Qualitative Study on Violations and Experiences.

Carme Perelló-Iñiguez, Victoria García-Garro, Desirée Mena-Tudela, Ainoa Biurrun-Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carme Perelló-IñiguezDoctoranda Programa en Ciudadanía y Derechos Humanos Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-8439
Victoria García-GarroMatrona en Hospital del Mar. Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, España.
Desirée Mena-TudelaUnitat Predepartamental D'infermeria, Facultat de Ciències de la Salut. Institut Feminista. Universitat Jaume I. Avda. Sos I Baynat s/n, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-3064
Ainoa Biurrun-GarridoDepartament D'infemeria de Salut Pública, Salut Mental i Maternoinfantil. Facultat D'infermeria. Universitat de Barcelona. Research Group DAFNis, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1955-1526

Funding

VULVIDE PID2022-140179OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore how women experience and interpret autonomy in obstetric care across pregnancy, childbirth, abortion, and the postpartum period. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with women who had received obstetric-gynecological care. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through hybrid thematic analysis. Participants described multiple constraints on autonomy associated with hierarchical professional relationships, limited information, and protocol-driven care practices. Autonomy emerged as a multidimensional and relational process extending beyond formal informed consent and encompassing bodily, decisional, emotional, and relational aspects. These experiences influenced both childbirth perceptions and trust in healthcare professionals, indicating the need for greater attention to communication, shared decision-making, and relational support in clinical practice. Constraints on women's autonomy in obstetric care raise important ethical and human-rights considerations. Nurses specializing in obstetrics and gynecology play a key role in fostering respectful communication, supporting informed decision-making, and promoting care practices aligned with dignity and autonomy.

Indexed as

ObstetricsPersonal AutonomyAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative Researchbioethicshuman rightsobstetric violencepersonal autonomyviolencewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41916682
PMCPMC13038392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.