ReviewHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2026
[Research advances in clear aligner].
Review in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically reviews the latest research advances in clear aligners across materials science, clinical treatment outcomes, and impacts on oral health. In materials science, research focuses on membrane biocompatibility, development of bio/smart composite aligners, and direct printing technology for clear aligners. Although mainstream materials are generally safe, some still harbor cytotoxic risks. Smart composite materials offer novel strategies for monitoring and preventing enamel demineralization and bacterial biofilm formation by integrating sensors or incorporating antimicrobial agents. Directly printed aligner technology demonstrates significant potential due to its customizability and high precision. Regarding clinical efficacy, evidence indicates that clear aligners achieve comparable results with fixed appliances for mild-to-moderate malocclusions, though their efficiency and effectiveness are slightly inferior in complex extraction cases. Regarding specific tooth movement control, arch expansion primarily relies on crown inclination, yielding results below design expectations; molar distalization achievement is also limited. Studies refute the notion that a specific "bite-ramp effect" causes mandibular counterclockwise rotation. For skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusions in children, clear aligners combined with functional orthodontic modules show promising applications, though evidence levels require further enhancement. Regarding oral health impacts, multiple studies confirm that clear aligners effectively reduce enamel demineralization risk, decrease plaque accumulation, and improve periodontal health compared with fixed appliances. In summary, clear aligner technology has advanced toward great precision, efficiency, and personalization. However, clinicians must recognize its tool-like nature. Successful treatment fundamentally relies on comprehensive diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning, and meticulous clinical execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.