ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Appropriate Duration of First-line Immunotherapy for Advanced NSCLC and Predictive Factors].
Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First-line immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows significant survival benefits in patients without driver mutations, but the optimal duration of treatment remains controversial. Some studies support limiting immunotherapy to 2 years, arguing that longer treatment does not bring additional survival benefits; while other studies believe that treatment should continue until disease progression to maximize survival benefits. This article systematically reviews the current research progress on the duration of immunotherapy and discusses the potential predictive value of biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), the best efficacy response, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in individualized treatment decisions. More prospective studies, especially biomarker-driven trials, are still needed to clarify the optimal duration of treatment and establish an individualized treatment strategy based on multidimensional indicators. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.