SynthesisScientific reports2026
Effects of speed-agility-quickness (SAQ) training on pre-planned change-of-direction speed in adolescent and young adult team ball sport athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of speed-agility-quickness (SAQ) training on pre-planned change-of-direction speed (CODS) in adolescent and young adult team-sport athletes and to explore potential moderating factors. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, randomized controlled trials published from database inception to 15 November 2025 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies involved basketball, soccer, or handball athletes aged 9-26 years, with the experimental group receiving SAQ-dominant interventions and the control group performing routine training, regular sport-specific practice, no additional training, or other non-SAQ comparison conditions. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, restricted cubic spline meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessments were conducted. Twenty-two studies contributing 26 effect sizes were included, comprising 17 effect sizes for pre-planned CODS and 9 for linear sprint performance. Compared with controls, SAQ training significantly improved pre-planned CODS (SMD = - 0.71, 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.51, P < 0.00001) and also improved linear sprint performance (SMD = - 0.90, 95% CI - 1.18 to - 0.62). For CODS, subgroup analyses revealed no significant moderation by age (≤ 18 vs. > 18 years, P = 0.92), weekly training volume (≤ 120 vs. > 120 min/week, P = 0.19), competitive level (elite/club vs. school/university, P = 0.63), or sport discipline (basketball, soccer, handball). Meta-regression did not identify statistically significant non-linear associations for the examined moderators. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of the pooled estimates, although potential publication bias should be considered when interpreting the magnitude of the effects. SAQ training appears to be an effective strategy for improving pre-planned CODS and linear sprint performance in team-sport athletes aged 9-26 years. The available evidence suggests that these benefits may be observed across different age groups, training volumes, competitive levels, and sports, although variability in intervention design, outcome assessment, and study quality should be acknowledged. These findings support the inclusion of SAQ training within routine physical conditioning programs for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.