ArticleCommunications biology2026
Context-dependent indirect effects mediate ecological transitions between parasitism and mutualism.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Context-dependent indirect effects mediate ecological transitions between parasitism and mutualism.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symbiotic interactions frequently shift along a mutualism-parasitism continuum, altering host fitness, population dynamics, and microbial community structure with ecological context. Here, we integrate field surveys, reciprocal breeding experiments, feeding assays, and microbiome profiling to dissect interactions between phoretic mite (Poecilochirus carabi), nematode (Rhomborhabditis regina), and their burying beetle host (Nicrophorus nepalensis) during reproduction. We show that high nematode densities reduce beetle offspring survival during metamorphosis, but co-occurring mites mitigate these costs by preying on nematodes and suppressing vertical transmission, thereby enhancing beetle fitness. Both mites and nematodes are equally effective at suppressing bacterial loads on carrion, but mites drive greater shifts in carcass microbiome composition. Carcasses exposed to both symbionts display the most pronounced shifts in bacterial communities, suggesting that inter-symbiont interactions have cascading effects on host-associated microbiota. Intriguingly, in the absence of nematodes, mites impose fitness costs on their beetle hosts. These results demonstrate that the net effects of mites on beetle fitness emerge largely through indirect, density-dependent interactions with nematodes and microbial competitors. By integrating macro-symbiont and microbiome perspectives, our study highlights how phoresy extends beyond passive dispersal to actively restructure host-symbiont networks, highlighting the overlooked potential of indirect effects in driving context-dependent mutualism within multisymbiotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.