Evidence mapPaperPMID 41917839Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Multimodal MRI and machine learning for identifying depression in cerebral small vessel disease: a multicenter study.

Guihan Lin, Weiyue Chen, Yongjun Chen, Lei Xu, Ting Zhao, Zufei Wang, Min Xu, Chenying Lu, Minjiang Chen, Shuiwei Xia and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guihan Lin *Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Weiyue Chen *Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Yongjun ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Lei XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Ting ZhaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Lishui Central Hospital, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Zufei WangZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Min XuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Chenying LuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Minjiang ChenZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Shuiwei XiaZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China.
Jiansong JiZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, 323000, China. jjstcty@wmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Youth Project of Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation LLSQN26H090002Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2024KY562Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2025KY1964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a machine learning (ML) model utilizing multimodal MRI in distinguishing cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) patients with depression (CSVD + D) from those without depression (CSVD − D). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study involved 198 participants from three centers, who were divided into training (n = 113; CSVD + D = 56, CSVD − D = 57), external validation 1 (n = 85; CSVD + D = 31, CSVD − D = 54), and 2 (n = 102; CSVD + D = 39, CSVD − D = 63) cohorts. Structural, functional, and diffusion tensor imaging was used to extract features, which were utilized to construct ML models based on nine ML classifiers. The efficacy of the models was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. SHapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis provided deep insights into the model’s interpretability.

resultsTwelve features from multimodal MRI were finally identified. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier performed the best. The XGBoost-based multimodal model integrating features from all three modalities achieved high diagnostic performance, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.958, 0.893, and 0.917 in the training, external validation 1 and 2 cohorts, respectively, and accuracies of 0.929, 0.871, and 0.853. The SHAP results revealed that the key contributing features included elevated amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the superior frontal gyrus and reduced fractional anisotropy in the default mode network.

conclusionIntegrating multimodal MRI and ML may improve the classification performance for identifying CSVD + D, suggesting the potential value of multimodal imaging markers in the assessment of CSVD-related depressive symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasesDepressionMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveCerebral small vessel diseaseDepressionMachine learningMultimodal MRI

Identifiers

PMID41917839
PMCPMC13162360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.