Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918004›Full record

ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026

Efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD) on reducing pain and functional impairment associated with exercise-induced muscle injury: a randomized placebo-controlled feasibility trial.

J W Stauffer, J A Crow, M D Bishop, R L Cook, P A Borsa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04586712 (Efficacy of a Controlled Short-term Trial of Cannabidiol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04586712 phase2completednot on this map

Efficacy of a Controlled Short-term Trial of Cannabidiol (CBD) Ingestion on Reducing Symptomatic Response and Facilitating Recovery After Induced Muscle Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsMuscle Injury, Recovery, Pain ReliefArmsActive CBD, Vehicle Control (Placebo)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J W StaufferDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J A CrowDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgia Prevention Institute, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
M D BishopDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
R L CookDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
P A BorsaDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. pborsa@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise and sports-related musculoskeletal injuries often result in pain, and the recovery process can be prolonged and challenging. Many physically-active Americans have begun using cannabidiol (CBD) for pain relief and improved recovery time, and CBD is of particular interest due to its positive safety profile, non-intoxicating effects, and therapeutic potential. Our objectives were threefold. First, to confirm the safety and tolerability of ingesting a CBD-rich hemp-extract. Second, we examined the feasibility and acceptability of our recruitment and blinding methods, and the tests and measures used to determine preliminary efficacy. Last, we planned to examine within-group effect sizes and observed power to make preliminary determinations of efficacy.

methodsA randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, two-arm parallel study design was used with participants randomly allocated to either a CBD or a placebo control group. Participants completed a 15-day study trial which included baseline testing, intervention (CBD/placebo dosing), and follow-up assessments on days 11 through day 15 (24 to 96-hrs post-injury). Outcomes included pain intensity, strength loss, and physical disability. Participants self-administered the investigational product (CBD or placebo) under the tongue twice daily for 15 days. Daily dosage of CBD was 67 mg. An experimental injury protocol for the quadriceps muscle group on day 10 induced pain and functional disability in otherwise healthy men (n = 9) and women (n = 20) [age: 20.1 yrs, weight: 64.2 ± 8.5 kg, height: 169 ± 5.3 cm].

resultsThere were no reports from participants of side effects or treatment-emergent adverse reactions from consuming the investigational products. Symptoms and functional deficits were most pronounced 24 to 48 h. post-injury and were least pronounced by 96-hrs post-injury. CBD users reported less peak pain at rest and with movement at 48-hrs post-injury. The CBD group showed less strength impairment and physical disability than placebo at 48-hrs post-injury.

conclusionsSublingually administered CBD demonstrated a favorable safety profile and showed promise in reducing pain-related symptoms associated with exercise-induced muscle injury. Clinical studies using larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the reported estimates of efficacy in reducing pain and improving function post-injury. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04586712, registered on October 14, 2020.

Indexed as

Cannabidiol (CBD)ImpairmentInjuryMusculoskeletalPainPhysical disabilitySafety

Identifiers

PMID41918004
PMCPMC13159225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.