ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2026
A clinical-biomarker fusion model for risk prediction of coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model integrating multidimensional clinical indicators and laboratory biomarkers for the early and precise assessment of coronary artery lesion (CAL) risk in Kawasaki disease.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 children with Kawasaki disease admitted between January 2020 and June 2024. The sample size was calculated using PASS 2021 software (α = 0.05, 1-β = 80%), with post-hoc power exceeding 85%. Patients were randomly allocated into a training set (n = 224) and a validation set (n = 96) in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, univariate analysis identified CAL-associated indicators (P < 0.05). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for variable compression and feature selection. The core variables were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors. Based on these factors, three machine learning models—Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)—were constructed. Model performance was evaluated using the AUC, calibration curves, and DCA. Interpretability was analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.
resultsNo significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the training and validation sets (P > 0.05). Univariate analysis identified seven significant indicators. LASSO regression refined these to five core variables. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed all five as independent risk factors for CAL (P < 0.05). Among the machine learning models, the GBM model demonstrated superior performance, with AUC of 0.872 (95% CI: 0.798–0.945) in the training set and 0.790 (95% CI: 0.623–0.957) in the validation set. Calibration curves were closest to the ideal line. DCA indicated net clinical benefit across a wide threshold probability range. SHAP analysis provided intuitive prediction interpretability.
conclusionAn integrated clinical-biomarker model was developed and validated for the early prediction of CAL in Kawasaki disease. The model demonstrates good discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility. and provides a promising tool for the early identification of high-risk children and the optimization of intervention strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.