ArticleJournal of bone and joint infection2026
Advancing diagnostics in suspected periprosthetic joint infections using synthetic synovial fluid and microcalorimetry.
Article in Journal of bone and joint infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and accurate pathogen detection is essential for effective management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), yet conventional culturing (CC) often yields false-negative results and requires prolonged incubation times. In the present study we compared the performance of CC to that of two alternative approaches, i.e., culturing in synthetic synovial fluid (SSF2) and isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC). A total of 79 synovial fluid (SF) samples from patients with suspected PJI were included; for these samples, CC data were available. Samples were incubated in SSF2 (aerobically and anaerobically, for 10 d), and isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). With IMC we determined the time to detect microbial activity in the samples (in two different media; brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and fluid thioglycolate medium (FTM)). Culturing in SSF2 yielded the highest positivity rate (53.2 %), followed by IMC and CC (34.2 % and 32.9 %, respectively). More than one-third of all positive samples were detected only after culturing in SSF2 (39.3 %), and this approach also revealed the greatest microbial diversity. IMC enabled rapid detection of microbial activity in a sample, with median detection times of 15.9 h in BHI and 15.6 h in FTM. Our results demonstrate that culturing of SF samples in SSF2 increased the diagnostic yield and that IMC reduced the time to identify clinical samples that contain viable microorganisms. This highlights the potential of these approaches; however further optimization is warranted to integrate them in diagnostic PJI workflows.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.