ArticleAJP reports2026
A Pilot Study Evaluating Associations between Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Pregnancy and Postpartum A1c and Blood Pressure.
Article in AJP reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the relationship between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics during gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-affected pregnancy and postpartum cardiometabolic measures in a pilot study. Study Design: We enrolled participants >6 months postpartum from a previous GDM trial where they wore a CGM during the third trimester. At the postpartum visit, we assessed hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP). We used linear regression models adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) at the time of CGM wear to test for a relationship between pregnancy CGM metrics (mean glucose, coefficient of variation, time in pregnancy range 63-140 mg/dL [pTIR], time >120 and >140 mg/dL) and postpartum outcomes (HbA1c and BP). Results: Of 14 eligible participants with pregnancy CGM data, 11 (79%) returned at a mean of 20.3 months postpartum (range 11-33). Age and BMI during pregnancy CGM wear were 36.0 (2.7) years and 28.7 (5.5) kg/m Conclusion: Third-trimester CGM pTIR should be tested as a predictor of postpartum glycemia in a larger study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.