ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
A narrative review of spatial multi-omics and organ-on-a-chip technologies for cardio-cerebral-renal crosstalk.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inter-organ communication within the cardio-cerebral-renal axis orchestrates systemic homeostasis and disease progression. However, conventional methods fail to capture its spatiotemporal complexity; consequently, this creates evidence gaps in dynamic network dissection. Therefore, spatial multi-omics and organ-on-a-chip (OOC) technologies enable unprecedented investigation of these pathways. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spatial multi-omics and organ-on-a-chip (OOC) technologies (intervention) compared to conventional methods (comparator) in decoding cardio-cerebral-renal crosstalk for systemic disorders (population) on outcomes including sensitivity, resolution, and detection accuracy (outcomes). Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2021 to December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. We included 34 studies comprising randomized trials, cohort studies, and preclinical validations. We employed narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis where appropriate. Results: Based on 34 studies involving a substantial number of participants and samples, spatial multi-omics and OOC technologies demonstrated improved sensitivity and better identification of pathogenic networks compared to conventional methods. The findings suggest a consistent trend toward enhanced performance, though heterogeneity across studies was noted. Conclusion: Building on these findings, we conclude that these technologies establish a novel paradigm for decoding multi-organ communication, revealing molecular mechanisms (e.g., exosomal miRNA regulation) and providing clinically actionable biomarkers. However, evidence certainty is moderate due to heterogeneity, thus supporting future precision medicine applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.