Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41918742›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Challenges in the standardization of innate immune status assessment.

Ying Liu, Tingfang Mao, Rong Chen, Hairong Luo, Shiyu Zhang, Feng Chen, Xiang Shen, Wan Li, Jinhui Liu, Guiping Guan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ying LiuHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Tingfang MaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Rong ChenCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hairong LuoCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shiyu ZhangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Feng ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiang ShenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Wan LiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jinhui LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Guiping GuanCollege of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zemeng FengHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yulong YinHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial defense against pathogens is the innate immunity, which is characterized by rapidity and the broad-spectrum operation that facilitates the rapid identification and removal of the invasion by microorganisms. The determination of innate immune status is a methodological approach to assessing the strength of innate immune defense and has been extensively utilized in vaccine development, disease surveillance, clinical stratification, and postoperative recovery. Nevertheless, discrepancies in indicator purposes, methodologies, and references are currently seen where quantitative judgments cannot rely on and be consistent. Hence, methodological innovation and analysis technologies need to be developed, and a standardized approach and common criteria should be created to address the increasing clinical and research needs of quantitative assessment. In the framework of human health and clinical practice, the given work gives a concise review of the key inadequacies of current approaches to innate immune evaluation, incorporates the modifications into the current assessment criteria, explains the drawbacks of modern technologies, and suggests an evaluation scheme involving many parameters to facilitate the standardization and quantification of the assessment of the innate immune status.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsHumansReference Standardsimmune detectionimmune status assessmentimmunological evaluation technologyinnate immunitystandardization

Identifiers

PMID41918742
PMCPMC13033490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.