ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Enhancing positive memory schemas with tDCS: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Negative schemas during depression drive persistent memory biases. Positive mood induction procedures (MIPs) can briefly counteract these but are often short-lived. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may enhance MIPs. We tested whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), compared to sham tDCS, could strengthen and prolong MIPs effects on mood and resulted in weaker negative memory bias. Methods: For this sham-controlled, within subject counterbalanced study we selected 20 dysphoric participants (BDI-II > 13). Mood state was assessed via visual analogue scales before and immediately after the MIP and at session end. Memory was assessed using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false-memory task and a Self-Referent Encoding Task, measuring recall accuracy, recognition indices (hits, false alarms, d'), and self-referent memory bias. Results: Condition and time did not interact on mood states in this pilot study. However, exploratory analyses revealed that active tDCS significantly reduced sadness at the final time point compared to sham tDCS. The active tDCS condition resulted in less false recognition of negative words in the DRM Task, but the condition and valence interaction were non-significant for hit rates. Participants in the active tDCS condition better discriminated against critical lures and recalled more words overall. Conclusion: tDCS over the DLPFC may prolong MIP effects, reduce negative memory bias and promote more positive, mood-congruent schema processing. These findings support integrating NIBS with personalised MIPs as a promising avenue for decreasing depression characteristics. Future work should test repeated tDCS sessions, larger samples, and ecologically valid memory bias and mood assessments to strengthen clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.