Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919756›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

How genetic counselors in North America describe their professional identity.

Lisa Schwartz, Kaye Stenberg, Andrea Casey, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, Mia S Mackall, McKinsey L Goodenberger, Aishwarya Arjunan, Sarah Witherington, Isha Kalia, Rachel Mills

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, The George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-4948
Kaye StenbergSchool of Health Professions, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3965-1973
Andrea CaseyDepartment of Human and Organizational Learning, The George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3668-5829
Jennifer FitzpatrickDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8714-6164
Mia S MackallNatera, Inc, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-6299
McKinsey L GoodenbergerDepartment of Lab Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-6344
Aishwarya ArjunanDepartment of Medical Affairs, GRAIL, LLC., Menlo Park, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-2388
Sarah WitheringtonQuest Diagnostics, Inc, Secaucus, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-4061
Isha KaliaOtogenetics Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-3886
Rachel MillsMS Genetic Counseling Program, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-9503

Funding

National Society of Genetic Counselors 2023 JEMF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional identity is defined as the attitudes, behaviors, values, and experiences by which individuals define themselves in a professional role and is influenced by socialization during training and in the workplace. As professional identity develops and is integrated with one's personal identities, it allows an individual to think, act, and feel like a member of their chosen profession and to develop a sense of meaning, confidence, and satisfaction in their work. Conflicts may arise due to perceived differences between one's professional identity and the collective identity of the profession, resulting in stress, burnout, and attrition, all of which can negatively impact patient care and the collective identity of the genetic counseling profession. Using Social Identity Theory (SIT) as a theoretical framework to develop the semi-structured interview protocol, recorded interviews were conducted with 50 genetic counselors who were purposefully sampled to ensure diversity of personal demographics (gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, and caregiver status), as well as years, settings, and roles in genetic counseling practice. Transcripts were coded and subjected to codebook thematic analysis using NVivo. Genetic counselors described their professional identity in terms of who they are (characteristics and attributes), what they do (actions and skills), and what they have (training and knowledge). The majority of participants had a multidimensional perspective of what it means to be a genetic counselor, noting the transferability of their skills to a broad set of roles and settings, which supported their sense of professional identity, particularly for those who were no longer seeing patients. Yet many expressed tension with the collective identity of the profession. Expanded opportunities for genetic counselors to work in new settings and roles require review and revision of key professional documents to ensure they are reflective of the collective identity of the genetic counseling profession.

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingSocial IdentificationFemaleHumansMaleSocial Groupdefinitiongenetic counselinggenetic counselorsprofessional identityroles

Identifiers

PMID41919756
PMCPMC13041187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.