Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41919845›Full record

ReviewCritical care science2026

Sex and gender differences in hemostasis in critical illness.

Julie Helms, Nicole P Juffermans, Toshiaki Iba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie HelmsFaculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire TARGET - Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-6800
Nicole P JuffermansDepartment of Intensive Care and Emergency Perioperative and Intensive Care Laboratory, Erasmus Medical Center - Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-6574
Toshiaki IbaFaculty of Medical Science, Juntendo University - Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-4088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical illness disrupts hemostasis through tightly linked inflammatory, endothelial, platelet, and coagulation pathways collectively described as immunothrombosis. These mechanisms are not sex-neutral. Biological sex and gender-related factors influence baseline coagulation profiles, vascular function, fibrinolysis, and platelet reactivity, and may therefore modify thrombotic and bleeding phenotypes observed in the intensive care unit. This short review summarizes current evidence on sex-associated differences in hemostatic biology and their clinical implications in critical illness. It outlines priorities for sex-stratified research to support more precise hemostatic management in the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHemostasisBlood CoagulationFemaleFibrinolysisHumansMaleSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID41919845
PMCPMC13124112

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.