ArticleCritical care science2026
Benchmarking and efficiency assessment in intensive care units: a systematic review protocol.
Article in Critical care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify research gaps and propose strategies for enhancing the quality and efficiency of critical care services globally.
methodsWe will explore and analyze metrics, models, and methodologies for efficiency assessment and benchmarking in intensive care units, including both static and longitudinal approaches. For so, we will comprehensively search three electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase) using predefined keywords combined with Boolean operators. The search will target peer-reviewed studies without time frame restrictions. Duplicates will be removed, and two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of articles based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant data will be extracted and organized thematically using a standardized form aligned with PRISMA guidelines. The extracted data will include a study of characteristics, methodologies, and outcomes, enabling structured mapping and synthesis of existing evidence. This review does not require ethical approval.
resultsThe findings will be disseminated through open-access journal publications and national and international conferences presentations. The results will also be shared with key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers, to foster discussions on improving intensive care unit performance.
conclusionThis review will synthesize available evidence on ICU efficiency assessment, contributing to standardization efforts and guiding future research priorities aimed at strengthening critical care management and benchmarking practices worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.