ReviewJACC. Asia2026
Conceptual Reconsideration of the Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension: From 5 Groups to 2 Groups.
Review in JACC. Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a hemodynamic condition arising from heterogeneous, often overlapping triggers. Although the etiology-driven 5-group classification provides an essential framework for disease definition and research standardization, it is frequently challenged in real-world practice, where cardiopulmonary multimorbidity is common and often delays therapeutic decision making. Here, we propose a complementary, treatment-oriented binary framework that stratifies pulmonary hypertension by dominant structural mechanisms: pulmonary microvasculopathy versus pulmonary large-vessel stenosis. Although anatomically grounded, this distinction primarily reflects pathophysiological processes, hemodynamic behaviors, and therapeutic responsiveness. Rather than supplanting current classifications, it highlights lesion-level features directly relevant to therapeutic strategy. We outline pragmatic diagnostic pathways integrating anatomical imaging, hemodynamic confirmation, and systematic evaluation of cardiopulmonary comorbidities, emphasizing early identification of potentially revascularizable large-vessel disease, where surgical or endovascular intervention may yield substantial and durable clinical benefit. This pathophysiology-driven perspective aims to simplify frontline decision making, reduce diagnostic delay, and support treatment precision across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.