Trial reportCellular and molecular neurobiology2026
A Hypothesis-Generating Pharmacologic Profile for Sargramostim Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.
Trial report in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03790670 (Safety, Tolerability and Biomarker Assessments of Leukine), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety, Tolerability and Biomarker Assessments of Leukine (Sargramostim) During Extended Timed Treatment for Parkinson's Disease: A Phase I Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The connection between immunity and Parkinson’s disease (PD) is well-established. Myeloid immune responses influence the microenvironment of the central nervous system (CNS), which can be modulated by sargramostim, a recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Previous studies have demonstrated sargramostim’s neuroprotective effects, which are linked to its safety and tolerability, as well as its ability to regulate innate immunity. Changes in myeloid biomarkers correlate with clinical responses. PD symptoms were assessed using the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS). Ten subjects received sargramostim through subcutaneous injections of 3 µg/kg, administered five days every week. Myeloid biomarkers were measured before treatment and at six and twelve months of treatment. Protein expression by Western blotting and gene expression by transcriptomic analysis was correlated with UPDRS III scores. Recognizing the exploratory nature of this study, patient responses were classified into potent, moderate, or no change groups based on UPDRS III score reductions of 9–13, 5–7, or none, respectively. Biomarkers from all 10 patients identified FOXP3 as a “potential” signature biomarker. The potent responders showed biomarkers linked to autophagy, inflammatory, and antioxidant proteins, including ATG7, HMOX1, RELA, and TLR8. Moderate responders displayed biomarkers associated with RELA and LRRK2. Transcriptomic analysis revealed over 2000 differentially expressed anti-inflammatory, calcium-binding, and epigenetic genes. Among these, genes such as ANXA9, CALM3, CY7B1, HDAC4, HMGB2, NR2F6, PDIA3, REST, SACS and SOX4 were identified as potential predictors of changes in UPDRS III scores. Baseline levels of ATG7, CARD9, and SACS may serve as initial biomarkers to identify subjects likely to respond to sargramostim. Female patients exhibited unique UPDRS III scores in response to sargramostim treatment. Novel cell-based biomarker signatures were identified that may predict responses to sargramostim treatment in this hypothesis-generating study. We acknowledge the inherent study limitations by limited patient numbers. This was reflected in the comparisons offered for the patient sub-groups in the year-long trial.Trial Registration The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03790670, dated 01.30.2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.