ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
Focal-DenseNet: A Risk Assessment Framework for Alzheimer's Disease in Heterogeneous MRI Data.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of the nervous system, which has become an important public health issue attracting global attention. However, its exact causes and pathogenesis have not been fully elucidated, and the existing treatment methods and intervention measures have limited efficacy. Therefore, how to establish a scientific and efficient risk assessment mechanism has become the key to the prevention and treatment of AD. Aiming at this problem, this paper optimizes the convolutional neural network structure of DenseNet and proposes a Focal-DenseNet model that integrates the focal loss function for the risk assessment and diagnostic prediction of AD. First of all, preprocess the collected data to ensure the data quality for subsequent analysis. Secondly, establish the Focal-DenseNet model. Finally, use the model for training and testing. The test results show that the test set accuracy of the model reaches 98.98%, indicating that the model performs well. In addition, this paper also compares the proposed model with the DenseNet model without using the focal loss function and other common deep learning models (such as VGG16, ResNet, etc.). The results show that the model in this paper exhibits superiority in multiple performance indicators. In particular, it has achieved high scores in key indicators such as accuracy, AUC (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), precision, and recall. This study provides an efficient technical support for the early risk assessment of AD, and holds significant clinical application value and academic reference significance for improving the prevention and treatment level of AD and reducing the global public health burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41920507What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.