Evidence mapPaperPMID 41920589Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2026

Evaluating a Telehealth Coaching and Mobile-Based Digital Engagement Intervention for People With Cancer Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health: Pilot Questionnaire Study.

Shen Wang, Toni Rose Jue, Tim Atkins, Scott A Irwin, Puneet Nanda, Davinder Sangar, Lynette Mackenzie, Raghav Murali-Ganesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shen WangOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8190-4399
Toni Rose JueOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-5973
Tim AtkinsOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8021-1628
Scott A IrwinCedars-Sinai Cancer, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7868-1641
Puneet NandaOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1755-5504
Davinder SangarOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8761-9352
Lynette MackenzieFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-2051
Raghav Murali-GaneshOsara Health, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7068-196X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with cancer often experience unmet needs during treatment and survivorship, which can impact their ability to carry out daily tasks, reduce their quality of life, and limit their participation in work and social activities. Cancer Coach by CancerAid (now known as Osara Health) is a digital health intervention designed to address these needs through a combination of synchronous telehealth coaching and an asynchronous mobile app that supports behavior change and emotional well-being.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of Cancer Coach by CancerAid on the mental and physical health of people with cancer using patient-reported outcomes.

methodsParticipants were referred to the program via insurers and hospital clinics. Health coaches administered the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-item Global Health Short Form via telephone at both the beginning and end of the intervention. This tool measures global physical health (GPH) and global mental health (GMH). Pre- and postintervention scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Independent 2-tailed t tests assessed whether changes in GPH and GMH scores were associated with the use of health coaching alone or in combination with the mobile app.

resultsStatistically significant improvements were observed in both GPH (z=-4.97; P<.001; r=0.37) and GMH (z=-4.53; P<.001; r=0.34), indicating moderate effect sizes in the 89 participants. The average T score point changes of 4.43 for GPH and 4.58 for GMH represented a minimal important change for participants. The improvement in the group GMH T score was reflected in the move from "good" to "very good" mental health status. Participants who engaged with both health coaching and the mobile app showed greater improvements in physical health, whereas those who received health coaching alone exhibited higher gains in mental health. This suggests that the mode of support may influence specific health outcomes.

conclusionsThe use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-item Global Health Short Form showed that participants had significant improvements in physical and mental health after participating in the Cancer Coach by CancerAid️ intervention. The integration of telehealth coaching with app-based support may enhance overall well-being and address holistic needs during cancer treatment and survivorship.

Indexed as

MentoringMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTelemedicineAdultAgedDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairescancercoachingdigitalmental healthphysical healthtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41920589
PMCPMC13085991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.