Evidence mapPaperPMID 41920847Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sustainable evaluation procedure for residual commingled waste after recycling, factoring in the percentage content of solid components.

Zbigniew Jelonek, Iwona Jelonek, Przemysław Rompalski, Justyna Guzy-Proc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zbigniew JelonekUniversity of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-6435
Iwona JelonekUniversity of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-9007
Przemysław RompalskiCentral Mining Institute - National Research Institute, Department of Solid Fuels Quality Assessment, Katowice, Poland.
Justyna Guzy-ProcCentral Mining Institute - National Research Institute, Department of Solid Fuels Quality Assessment, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of residual municipal waste after recycling is becoming an increasingly problematic procedure, while the challenges related to this process are multi-dimensional and encompass environmental, economic and social factors. As per the recommendations of the European Union, it is more beneficial for the residual fraction to undergo disposal via waste-to-energy conversion in specialist incineration plants and monitored low-power boilers than by landfilling. Such a process not only limits the negative impact on the environment that is characteristic of landfilling but also makes it possible to obtain additional electric and thermal energy. In this paper, the authors indicate the key role of the precise determination of solid waste composition before thermal conversion or storage. They also present a new optical method of residual fraction analysis for solid component proportion determination. It should be stressed that the precise knowledge of the waste composition can streamline decision making as regards selective waste recycling and reprocessing, including, e.g., excess organic matter separation. The conducted analyses showed that with an increase in the organic fraction content in waste from 30% to 90%, there is an increase in the emission of, among other things, particulate matter from 124.96 mg/m3 to 393.47 mg/m3, CO from 819.06 mg/m3 to 2161.67 mg/m3, and VOCs from 0 mg/m3 to 117.1 mg/m3.

Indexed as

RecyclingRefuse DisposalSolid WasteWaste ManagementIncinerationSolid Waste

Identifiers

PMID41920847
PMCPMC13042785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.