ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
The genomic architecture of local adaptation in two connected populations of three-spined stickleback.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Populations often adapt to their local environments despite the homogenizing effects of gene flow, but the genomic mechanisms enabling this process remain unclear. Theory predicts that adaptive divergence under high connectivity is favored when beneficial alleles cluster in regions of reduced recombination, a pattern that can be reinforced by structural variants (SVs). We investigated this in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from the St. Lawrence Estuary, where distinct freshwater and marine ecotypes meet and interbreed along a short ecological gradient. Using long- and short-read whole-genome sequencing, we mapped fine-scale recombination landscapes, cataloged SVs, and examined their relationship with adaptive genomic regions. Recombination landscapes differed between populations, with population-specific shifts in recombination rate estimated by an LD-based method. Putatively adaptive regions were not confined to low-recombination regions, yet SVs (inversions, insertions, and deletions) frequently coincided with local recombination suppression and elevated differentiation, suggesting they may contribute to local adaptation. Differentiated regions also overlapped disproportionately with previously-identified regions involved in repeated local adaptation across the species range, which tended to be strongly enriched on chromosomes IV, VII and XXI. These repeated regions were associated with lower recombination rates, suggesting that recombination suppression may contribute to their reuse across populations. As found in stickleback populations from other regions, the St. Lawrence populations exhibit elements suggestive of concentrated architectures clustered in a few genomic regions, along with relatively diffuse patterns of highly differentiated regions distributed genome-wide, across a wide range of recombination rates. These results highlight the intertwined roles of recombination variation and structural variation in shaping evolutionary trajectories in connected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.